It has been a while since we have had an issue of that highly praised authoritative journal, Queensland Taxi Magazine.
Forgive me for not knowing when it is due but I find that I have other concerns.
However, it has been brought to my attention from time to time by drivers informing of the rot it proffers in each edition. In the past year, I have witnessed an increase in readership as the magazine is passed around the ranks and commented upon by drivers. The comments are sometimes angrily expressed but usually they carry a tone of mirth as in, "Who is he trying to kid?"
This is often the type reference made to the writings of CEO Blur Davies or the President Maxie McBride.
I have chosen to ignore the false claims and misrepresentations of the magazine. My background in media has taught to never rubbish the opposition. It only gives them more recognition than they deserve.
Besides, I did not believe that anyone in the industry would believe the nonsense sprouted by these two when the obvious contradiction of the truth was in front of everyone to see
eg. No increase in accidents
no complaints from passengers
everything is just a media beat-up and the CDAQ is just a bunch of disgruntled cabbies trying to cause trouble.
Well you know the truth, so why waste time on it, even though it would be fun to tear the claims apart, there is too much else to do, so why bother?
But when it comes to misinformation that causes havoc among the people they are "claiming" represent, it is my duty to correct it.
On page 16 of Issue 5 is the two page article, "New and amended Queensland road rules". Under "Seatbelts" is the statement, "the driver of the vehicle is now also responsible for ensuring that all passengers regardless of age are wearing a properly fastened and adjusted seatbelt."
This belief has caused problems such as a recent assault on a foreign student driver who insisted that his intoxicated passenger wear his seatbelt before the driver would depart with him and a police officer in Mackay threatening to book all taxi drivers who allowed their passengers to travel without a seatbelt. Just two of the instances that came to my attention.
Here is the rule.
Transport Operations (Road Use Management Road Rules) Regulation 2009
Part 16 Rules for persons travelling in or on vehicles
#265 (3) The driver of a motor vehicle (except a bus or taxi) that is moving, or that is stationary but not parked, must ensure
. etc
When the subject was first aired on the ABC with Kelly Higgins-Devine interviewing Rachel Nolan, I did not hear it but I was contacted by another member and immediately contacted the ABC. I stated on air the law was unfair and unworkable if it applied to taxi drivers, particularly maxi drivers with many passengers out of sight in the back and the potential for inciting retaliation from drunken passengers. I said I had not heard what the minister had said and the host replayed part of the interview. From that I assessed that minister did not sound sure as to whether it applied to taxi drivers as she hesitated while answering. I later found out that the law was not hers but a federal initiative.
The next day, I contacted the minister's chief policy adviser, Daniel Cheverton with whom I had developed a good rapport, to seek further clarification. Soon after, I received a call from two Queensland Transport key personnel who assured me that taxi drivers were exempt.
That afternoon I went again on Kelly Higgins-Devine's programme and also Michael Smith's 4BC Drive programme and clarified the facts.
Seeing that Blair Davies heard my late night interview on ABC, (Caleb Maybir's case) it was a pity that he missed either of these prime time programmes.
Months after, particularly during the Don Brown inquiry sessions, I was continually called upon to clarify the myth that taxi drivers are not exempt from this regulation.
It shows how easily things can get out of control.
What would have happened if I had not clarified the position with Queensland Transport?
Obviously nothing if the Taxi Council of Queensland had been left to do it.
But then again, do they really have the responsibility of looking after the drivers? It is not in their constitution so why should they? It is just that some might think that claiming to be the Peak Industry Body might carry that responsibility.
This is a small issue compared to many facing the drivers at present but it is significant and demonstrates the need for us to have our own representative body. I should not have to explain this and it should not be left up to a few to look after all the drivers' interests.
Drivers, it is your industry, your future and your responsibility to yourself to get involved.
Eighteen months ago, we took over from the QTDA and evolved into the CDAQ. They said it would not achieve anything and it would not last.
With all that has transpired since, do we still need to answer that?
Do I need to refute the ridiculous and puerile claims about the CDAQ by Maxie McBride?
Surely you know what has been done, what needs to be done and what can be achieved.
If you have not done so, join the association. Cabbies are mostly a bunch of gamblers, so put in $45 and take a punt. The bookies have it as a long shot but the inside mail is that it is a good thing that's going to pay off.
In this case, there may be no magic finish line. The job is getting done and we will likely get there sooner or later. Your backing just makes it much sooner and more profitable.